“Our Monster Has Two Left Feet! And That’s OK!” Getting to Equity Through Cultural Competence

ImageContributing to our evolution toward equality (educational or otherwise) is a worthy goal for a school. Granted, systemic inequity seems to stack the deck against what even a well-intentioned school can accomplish when it comes to achieving equity. However, schools are a place where the audacity of hope, to borrow a phrase, has a right to exist, and schools are uniquely positioned to help make the world better than many outside of our schools seem to believe it can be.

Achieving educational equity requires schools that are not just aware of the differences among students, but that also celebrate them, and that leverage those differences–sensitively–for educational advantage. Schools like this are practicing what is now termed cultural competence. A school that promotes cultural competence enables differences to serve not as problems but as strengths of the communities in which we live and teach and learn.

Walt Whitman, in “I hear America Singing,” wrote about “the varied carols” he heard, and he concluded that one of our greatest strengths as a people is “Each singing what belongs to him or her and to none else.” The idea of cultural competence is to bring Whitman’s perspective into the classroom, strengthening every learner there. So what is necessary to make this kind of perspective possible in a particular school? At least three things are essential: faculty who value diversity, a curriculum that enables diverse students to flourish, and students who believe that equity for all is not just possible but is important.

To some extent, culturally competent schools result from the perspective and temperament of the faculty of those schools. As educators, we shape the experience of education for our students, and our experiences, in turn, have shaped us–especially with regards to our attitudes toward difference. I make no bones about the fact that a very painful awareness of my own differences shaped my perspective of the world. As an exceedingly awkward teenager, I developed, partly out of a desire to find ways to blend in, a keen sense of awareness of the differences between others and myself. I am grateful that I benefited from the support of educators who also noted the differences that I did and who encouraged me in various ways to take pride in my own uniqueness, and they inspired me to do the same for others like me. Those educators made my school, and as a result my world, a more welcoming place for me. Experiences exactly like this aren’t required for an educator to be attuned to difference, but however an educator arrives at a perspective that values difference, equity in schools (and, I think, beyond) cannot be achieved without educators strongly committed to supporting and celebrating diversity.

Cultural competence cannot be achieved if the idea of equity is an “appendix”—something bolted on to what we really do in schools. If we value the idea of supporting and celebrating our differences, equity must be built in to what we do, woven throughout the curriculum we teach. Acknowledging the different voices in the room as a normal part of what goes on in the classroom is something that teachers can work to effect in daily interactions in the classroom—both interactions between student and teacher and interactions between students. Even the best-intentioned educators can benefit from training that helps them develop practices designed to celebrate difference. For example, I’ve sought out training from the TRIBES Learning Community organization. TRIBES training emphasizes the creation of classrooms where students feel included, respected and heard–and where, as a result, students are more likely to have positive expectations for themselves and for each other. Based in part on practices developed during this training, and as a way to remind students of the different steps of the writing process, I begin each school year by collaborating with my students to write a classroom Constitution. Inevitably, our brainstorming and idea-organizing leads to a similar set of agreements each year: the right to be heard, the right to be respected, the right not to be made fun of, and the right to participate. This last right is in many ways the most important of the four. If students truly understand that everyone in a classroom has the right to engage in the learning that occurs in that classroom, they are more likely to remain aware of the ways their actions support, or infringe on, everyone’s engagement in the learning process. The written document that my students create with me hangs on the wall in our classroom, and students proudly point to it (literally) from time to time to encourage each other to be supportive when sometimes we get off track. Likewise, with very little effort it’s possible to find opportunities in my curriculum (which happens to be World Literature), to incorporate texts that celebrate difference–texts like Anaya’s Bless Me, Ultima, Shakespeare’s Othello, Shelley’s Frankenstein, and Things Fall Apart, by Achebe. I have chosen these texts in part because they give me and my students direct opportunities to explore our responsibility to grapple with the process of welcoming new kinds of beings into our conception of what it means to be “human.”

I take seriously my obligation to be sensitive to the strengths that come from our differences. But it is my students who most need to learn this sensitivity if equality is to become possible. A variety of studies reported on recently, including a study done by Joshua Aronson and Claude Steele and written about in The New York Times by Anne Murphy Paul, suggest that students perform less well in the classroom when reminded of their racial or gender differences. Aronson and Steele call this “the stereotype effect,” and it seems symptomatic of the ways that systemic inequity promulgates itself. In all sorts of ways, both subtle and obvious, our students buy into the idea that our differences are problematic, and their engagement in their own education suffers—especially among those students who have the most to lose from inequity. One of our most important tasks as educators interested in equity (educational or otherwise) is to help our students believe in what might be possible if equality were a reality. I know that I am helping my students believe in this when I see them embrace difference and advocate for the ways it strengthens us.

One day in my classroom something happened that helped me see how an approach embedded in the idea of cultural competence helps my students grow as learners and as people. Each year, after we finish reading Frankenstein, my students take part in a collaborative and artistic recreation of Shelley’s Monster. Different groups of students create different poster-board body parts, using quotations and pictures to depict various aspects of the Monster’s life. As the project ends, we stitch together these body parts, discussing the Monster’s life as we do so. One year, the class accidentally created a Monster with two left feet. Immediately, students started offering solutions. Cut the feet off, and switch them around. Switch the legs. Start again, and recreate one of the feet. But then one of the students piped up from the back of the room, “Wait a minute! Our Monster has two left feet. That’s the way he is. All of the problems in the book were the result of Victor not accepting the Monster the way he was. We should leave him just like he is. He’s fine!” And that’s what we did. It wasn’t exactly as poetic as Langston Hughes’ “I, Too, Sing America,” but this student’s realization was progress, and I’m glad to have had a hand in creating the kind of classroom that fosters among my students a belief in what cultural competence might allow us to achieve.

A Place-Based Writing Experiment: Phoenix Ghost

My students and I are experimenting a bit with place-based learning/place-based writing this summer. The following essay was my contribution to the experiment.

Image

One of the more impressive structures in downtown Phoenix, a city known lately for its modern architecture, is a building constructed in 1928 and now known as The Westward Ho. Actually, the 16-story gray and beige stone and stucco building is notable, but the structure that’s even more impressive is the steel antenna tower that sits on top of the
building. When I first noticed The Westward Ho, I thought it was some sort of optical illusion that caused the antenna tower to look taller than the building it sits on, but it’s no illusion. The 208 foot tall building is indeed supporting a 240 foot tall antenna tower. Despite appearances, the thing apparently isn’t on the verge of toppling over; the over-tall antenna has been perched atop the under-tall building since 1949.

The building has an impressive, albeit declining, history. It was the tallest building in Arizona for a little over 30 years. It was a popular hotel for many years, until around 1980. A 16th floor restaurant, called Top of the Ho, was a popular gathering spot, and its meeting rooms and ballrooms were the site of important business and political gatherings and wedding receptions for Phoenician high-society types. Vice President Richard Nixon breakfasted at the hotel before delivering a speech there in 1960. Ronald Reagan, in his actor-days, spoke to the Phoenix Chamber of Commerce at The Westward Ho in 1961. In the same year, President John F. Kennedy dined there at an event honoring Senator Carl Hayden. Its more recent history is a bit less illustrious. The hotel operating in the building since it opened shut down in 1980, and after changing hands and purposes a number of times, the building now serves as a subsidized residential facility for the aged and the mobility impaired. It has actually been refurbished and restored—twice now—so that, in outward appearance, it looks much like it did in its heydays, and inside it functions with safety and efficiency, meeting the needs of its current occupants. Presidents no longer dine there, but close to 300 residents do. And from a few personal accounts, from residents there, it’s a fine place to live, conveniently located, and well-maintained.

Many people in the area proudly note that The Westward Ho is famous in part for its appearance in the opening scenes of Alfred Hitchcock’s thriller, Psycho. They’re wrong. A building somewhat similar in appearance to The Westward Ho, with its own antenna tower, did appear in that film, but it wasn’t The Ho. The building did appear in a couple other minor films, including Bus Stop, with Marilyn Monroe, but its role in these films was also minor in comparison with the somewhat glamorous hotel Janet Leigh used for a little afternoon delight in Hitchcock’s blockbuster. But Phoenicians are proud of it anyway.

It is this “proud of it anyway”-ness that makes this building a perfect metaphor for Phoenix, the fifth, no wait, make that the sixth (Philadelphia overtook us in the last census) largest city in the country. The building was built during one of Phoenix’s booms. The fact that it remained the state’s tallest building for 32 years after it was constructed hints at the audacity of building a 16-story hotel in a dusty desert town that just a few years prior to the hotel’s construction had a population of under 30,000 (about the size of Apache Junction today—Phoenicians will see the humor in that). Once graced by one President, at least one Senator, two future Presidents, and some well-known actors and actresses, the building now plays host to a quieter, more sedate crowd, whose rubber soled shoes (and wheels) likely squeak a bit as they glide across the shiny floors that once echoed the clicking heels of the glamorous and powerful people who strode down its hallways and glided through its ballrooms. But Phoenicians are proud of it anyway. In fact, they’ve had it added to the National Register of Historic Places. They’ve restored it—twice. They’ve spent millions to tastefully upgrade it—so that it still looks old, but it works, like new. Which, in a way, is what Phoenicians have done to large portions of their city, which used to be a bigger deal than it seems to be now, reeling from an economy based on little more than giving bank loans to people to buy houses they couldn’t afford, and which tries, periodically, to reinvent itself. It’s a bio-tech hub! No, it’s an education capitol! Wait, it’s a banking center again! Woops, we mean it’s a new model for eco-friendly living! Or, hold on, it’s a great place to hold a convention! Please come and visit! It’s a fine place to live, conveniently located, and well-maintained.

In the interest of full disclosure, in case it’s not already obvious, I have very mixed feelings about living in this dusty town situated in the way-too-hot Valley of the Sun. However, as I do sometimes with Phoenix, I find The Westward Ho charming. Its about-to-topple-over tower and its slow decline into a comfortable place to live for the not-particularly-glamorous-anymore crowd are endearing. And there is one other aspect of the place that I find Imageappealing, embodied in its name, “The Westward Ho,” which shines proudly from a marquee above its main entrance. Leaving aside the meaning of the name, which I’ll get to in a moment, it is a moniker that sounds confident, cheery, and hopeful. Perhaps even a bit brash. It fits perfectly the (once) tallest building in a booming town in a newly-christened western state. But what does it mean? “Ho” is the word we need to figure out.

Granted, nowadays, “ho” has a less-than-savory meaning unless you’re a rapper peppering it through a chart-busting tune. But before it meant that, it had other uses. Shakespeare and the Elizabethans used it as an interjection, sort of a “hey!” or a “look here!” kind of word. That suits the brashness of The Westward Ho. Look here! This is quite a thing to behold—a fine, tall tower for the rich and powerful to enjoy! Seafarers also used the word. “Land ho!” they would shout when they finally sighted the place for which they had been sailing. In combination with “Westward,” this works, in a way, for the building but more so for Phoenix in general: Here is the western place you have been seeking! But as the hotel declines, and as Phoenix itself struggles to regain momentum, this interpretation of the building’s name is a bit more problematic. This isn’t the place as many people have been seeking (at least, not as many as have sought it out in the past). And there are other places—including places further westward—that many people, including Presidents and power-brokers and celebrities and socialites, are more interested in seeking: namely, just about any place in California. “Ho” can sometimes be used to suggest a destination not yet achieved. So “Westward Ho” could, in a way, serve as an unintended encouragement to continue westward, searching for the thing you want. In that sense, the building and its over-tall tower serve as a beacon in the middle of the desert, ushering travelers westward, to a more glamorous, more golden country just west of this place. “Westward Ho!” travelers. “On you go!” That was likely not the builders’ intention, but, in a way, it is truer than any other meaning of the name. This is a building that, in many ways like Phoenix, has been left behind.

The other evening, as I was exploring The Westward Ho just around dusk and taking some pictures of its impressive carved walls and antenna tower, I passed under the marquee at the entrance and glanced inside the lobby. A small crowd of what appeared to be tourists stood, looking wherever a guide pointed them. I couldn’t hear what he said, but the visitors seemed rapt, and there was a periodic chuckle as the guide delivered his presentation. I stepped off to the side as the group left the building, the guide ushering them to the next stop on their tour. He paused for a moment as people filed out, and then he looked in my direction.

“I give tours here every Saturday,” he said to me.

“Oh. Thanks!” I replied as he turned to catch up with the departing crowd.

One final member of the group glided up to me. She was wearing all white and smiling wanly. She silently handed me a business card and veered off in the direction of the crowd who had just left the building behind. The card read Phoenix Ghost Tours: History, Mystery and Haunts.

Sources

  • “Origin of ‘Homeward Ho!’” English Language & Usage. Stack Exchange, Inc., 16 May 2013. Web. 04 June 2013.
  • Towne, Douglas. “Phoenix in the 1920s.” Phoenix Magazine: Lilfestyles. Phoenix Magazine, Dec. 2010. Web. 04 June 2013.
  • Wikipedia contributors. “Westward Ho (Phoenix).” Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia, 8 Apr. 2013. Web. 4 Jun. 2013.
  • All photos by Jason Lobdell.

Good Teaching: The 5 Cs

5thPer4x6CC

5th Period, 2010-2011

I’ve worked in a variety of fields. Teaching is actually my third career, after a brief stint in real estate and a decade-plus career in advertising. Being a teacher is by far the hardest AND the most fun job I’ve ever done, and I look forward to every day that I get to call myself an educator. Recently, I was asked to describe the attributes of an outstanding teacher. Reflecting on my own experience as an educator and on several of the truly good teachers who have taught me, I believe that there are a number of characteristics that make a teacher outstanding. They are curiosity, creativity, clarity, collaboration, and compassion. (Please note that as I was writing this, I realized all of these attributes start with a C. That wasn’t on purpose, and I contemplated changing my list to avoid that because I’m not the kind of person who creates themed lists. But then I decided to remain true to my ideas, so the Cs shall remain.)

Curiosity is in many ways essential to teaching well. Wondering why things are the way they are, or how things really are, or what might be, fuels the kind of exploration that leads to authentic learning, which in turn leads to good teaching. In many ways, curiosity is an innate tendency. My mom tells me that my first sentence was, “What’s that?” But I think curiosity can be encouraged and even taught. I try very hard to teach my students the value of asking questions and to minimize their tendency to value getting to “the right answer.” Time spent curious is time spent discovering new information, new perspectives, and new possibilities. Teachers who are curious about their field of study and about the world in general are more likely to promote curiosity in their students.

Creativity is also an important attribute good teachers share. Part of the challenge of teaching is engaging learners in topics and ideas and processes those learners don’t find inherently interesting. Finding a variety of ways to entice learners into learning requires a creative approach, one that is open to new ways of seeing familiar things. I am often motivated toward creativity by something Zen Master Shunryu Suzuki said: “If the cows will not stay in the pasture, perhaps you should make the pasture bigger.” If my conception of something–of a topic or a process or an assignment–is not helping my students learn, I must be willing to expand my conception and find new ways to intrigue them.

Clarity is also an essential characteristic. Extraordinary teachers must have a number of things clear in their own minds: their objectives, their content, their intent for every instant in the classroom. Not that a good teacher’s conception of some of these things will never change, but in order to be effective, good teachers need to have a clear sense of where they’re headed and of how to get students to go there too. Clarity, in fact, will allow a teacher to make the kinds of adjustments in objectives, plans, activities, etc. (changes in the size of the pasture), that are often necessary in order to teach the learners who happen to be in the room at any given time.

Collaboration is a necessary skill for good teaching. Good teachers are willing and able to work with a variety of people in order to promote learning: fellow teachers within and outside their discipline, on- and off-campus service providers, parents, and students themselves. On my own campus, I am fortunate enough to work with colleagues who are excellent collaborators. My students clearly benefit. For example, I rely on collaboration to enable my students to utilize technology that enriches their learning. Each year, the first assignment I give my students is a Student Profile, which I use to gather all sorts of information, including information about their access to the kinds of technology I regularly incorporate into my curriculum. I have often used the information provided from this assignment to collaborate with our Community Liaison to help students access discounted Internet service at home, with our librarian (who is also our Mobile Tech Team Leader) to provide students with access to electronic devices they can check out on an as-needed basis. My curriculum itself is enhanced with mobile technology in large part because of the collaborative relationships I have with my fellow teachers on our school’s Mobile Tech Team. My students’ parents frequently ask me for advice on technology purchases and app recommendations for their children, and my students themselves are often the best resources when it comes to my learning about new apps and new applications of the technological tools I share with them.

Finally, compassion is, in my opinion, the bedrock of good teaching. Seeing students as people is essential to teaching them well. Good teachers work to create a classroom environment where diverse learners feel welcomed, heard, and respected because good teachers know that’s the kind of environment where learners learn best. I try to incorporate compassion and community-building into my curriculum from the first day of school. My students and I collaborate on the creation of a classroom Constitution at the beginning of each year, and each year my students welcome the inclusion of the idea that everyone should feel unafraid to participate in the education that goes on in our classroom—even when they stumble. One year, a student added a phrase to our Constitution that captured the kind of compassion that good teachers feel for their students and encourage them to feel for each other: “No one should make anyone’s day any harder than it needs to be.” Good teachers set the tone for this kind of compassionate “seeing” of the students in the room, and students can sense this compassion in every interaction.

Punking the Classics, #17: The Donut Eaters

919302_10200402484602700_1419714500_o

Periodically, I ask my students to take something we’ve read and tweak it a bit, updating it but keeping the core ideas. It’s fun. When I saw my friend Noah’s recent post about a visit to the local donut shop, I saw an opportunity…

“I drove thence surrounded by foul exhaust fumes for a space of what seemed like 9 days upon the roadways, but on the 10th day we reached the land of the Donut-eaters, who live on a food that comes from a kind of wheat. I sent two of my company to see what manner of men the people of the place might be. They started at once, and went about among the Donut-eaters, who did them no hurt, but gave them to eat of the donuts, which were so delicious that those who ate of them left off caring about home, and did not even want to go back and say what had happened to them, but were for staying and munching donuts with the Donut-eaters without thinking further of their return; nevertheless, though they wept bitterly I forced them back to the Honda Fit and made them fast in the back seat. Then I texted my wife to tell her I would drive home at once, lest any of the men should taste more of the donuts and leave off wanting to get home, so the men took their places in the back seat and smote me with their dirtiest of looks.”

(With apologies to Homer, Odysseus, and the original drugged out Lotus Eaters. Borrowed liberally from The Odyssey, Book IX, translated by Samuel Butler. Photo by Noah Scott Warman, used with permission.)

Using the Facilities

Image

When I decided to become a teacher, back in 2003, I spent a lot of time observing in a lot of high schools, getting a look at the ebb and flow of life in schools. Something I noticed early in that process was the signs on the bathroom doors. After working in the same office building for eight or ten years, I had gotten used to going to the bathroom without looking—at the signs, at least—but now, as I found my way around unfamiliar school buildings, I had to pay attention again.

I remember the first time I faced one of those signs, in a noisy hallway at Lane Tech College Prep High School on Chicago’s north side, trying to decide if this was the room for me. “Boys,” it said. What a quaint hold-over from an earlier era, I decided. Lane Tech had been built in 1918, and I figured that back then it was probably normal to call the male students “Boys” and the female students “Girls,” terms that struck me as a tad grade-school-ish for the pretty much fully grown high schoolers rumbling through the hall behind me. But after I had a few high school visits under my belt, I realized that Lane Tech’s signs weren’t an anachronism. Calling high schoolers “Boys” and “Girls,” at least when it comes to labeling their bathrooms, is pretty standard practice.

Fast forward almost a century, to the gleaming, new Arcadia High School and its gleaming, new bathrooms, and how are we labeling them? “Boys” and “Girls.” The bottom two signs in the image above are from the bathrooms—the “Boys” and “Girls” bathrooms—right outside my classroom door, and they’re identical to the signs labeling all 15 sets of student bathrooms on campus. The top two signs are from the “Men’s” and “Women’s” bathrooms in the office.

At first glance, there doesn’t seem to be anything wrong with these sets of signs. The “Boys” and “Girls” signs simply label the bathrooms intended for the use of male and female students (though, presumably, non-student adults who need to use the facilities are not forbidden from using them). Restrooms located for faculty, administrators, and other staff to use, the ones labeled “Men’s” and “Women’s,” are generally not in areas trafficked by students, so those more “mature” signs aren’t necessarily broadcasting the exclusiveness of their respective, more “adult” facilities, nor are they intended to signal any sort of “us vs. them” view held of students. I don’t think that large-scale generational warfare is afoot here—just description.

No, the only signs that bother me are the “Boys” and “Girls” signs on their own, and they bother me precisely because they are just that—descriptive, labeling bathrooms and, more importantly, the people who use them as if their users are stuck in their past rather than as if those users are about to become (and in fact may have already become) something completely different: “Men” and “Women.” Daily, educators encourage their students to envision the future, to see their way to success, to work today for tomorrow, and to become the kind of men and women who will make their families, their schools, their communities, and their country proud. And then we send them to pee in the little boys room.

Perhaps I’ve over thought this. I doubt that we’re doing significant damage to the egos of bold proto-men and proto-women, who leave for the loo confidently but return crestfallen after being reminded at the door that they’re only “Boys” and “Girls” after all. And I don’t really think they would return to class with more backbone and a sterner view of themselves if we started calling their bathrooms “Men’s” and “Women’s” rooms.

But what might happen if we did? As a teacher, I believe—very strongly—in the power of presenting people with possibilities they might not have considered. I believe that people rise to the occasions we help them create. I believe that every moment is a teachable moment, and that yes, even going potty like a “Man,” or like a “Woman,” is something our students have a right to envision.

Admittedly it’s too late, and too expensive, to change the signage on our lavatories (and the paperwork required would take the strength of ten men to complete), but are there other ways we ought to rethink the labels we use, often without thinking, to describe the young men and women we teach?

—–

This essay was inspired by Dwight Garner’s essay, “The Words We Live By,” which appeared in The New York Times on August 3, 2011, and which can be found at http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/04/arts/the-art-of-summer-words-we-live-by.html

NYPL Biblion Apps: An Invitation to Explore

The New York Public Library has created its second Biblion app (for iPad). Both in the series are amazing.

The more recently released second app–about Frankenstein–explores Mary Shelley’s sources, process, and lasting impact on literature and imagination, and it includes the novel. The first in the series is about the 1939-40 New York World’s Fair.

Both apps contain huge amounts of content from the NYPL’s collections, including expert essays, source materials, historical documents, original manuscripts, image galleries, audio and video files, and all sorts of information about the “ripple effect” created by the World’s Fair and Shelley’s novel.  There are social elements too. App users can add commentary and read or respond to commentary added by others. And the content is dynamic; the NYPL will add related content as it becomes available to them.

In the intro to the apps, the NYPL discusses how this kind of app seems like a natural evolutionary step for libraries and librarians. I agree. These apps are all about opening the stacks and helping users make connections between fascinating content.

And aside from the content itself, these apps seem like a really cool model for mobile-driven or online learning. I teach Frankenstein, and that app is full of great information presented in an engaging, thought provoking way–so much so that I’m planning to revise my unit to incorporate it. And both apps seem richer and far more engaging than a digital “textbook”–the authentic interactive element alone seems like a step up for such thought-provoking material. Who can’t help but think aloud (or via keyboard) about how Shelley’s story relates to contemporary conversations about what we think it means to be a monster–or to be human? And thoughts about the promise and peril of progress immediately bubble up in response to the World’s Fair app.

Though both apps are clearly “academic” in content, they are packaged in such a way that they seem much less like a “class” and much more like an invitation to explore.

Kudos to the NYPL!

(Image: http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/nypl-biblion-frankenstein/id521833980?mt=8)

8 Core Beliefs of Extraordinary Teachers

(This post is an adaptation of an article titled “8 Core Beliefs of Extraordinary Bosses,” which appeared at Inc.com, and which was written by Geoffrey James. This adaptation is published here with James’s permission. Find a link to his original article below.) 

The best teachers have a fundamentally different understanding of teaching and learning. Here are eight of their core beliefs.

1. Education is an ecosystem, not a battlefield.

Average teachers see education as a conflict between teachers, students and the distractions of the world around them both. They build airtight lesson plans and classroom systems that lead to ordering about and demonizing students as “targets,” treating their minds like “territory” to be conquered.

Extraordinary teachers see education as a symbiosis where the most diverse teachers and learners are the most likely to survive and thrive. They naturally create plans and systems that adapt easily to new opportunities and that foster connections between old and new ways of thinking, other disciplines, and competing ideas.

2. A classroom is a community, not a machine.

Average teachers consider their classroom to be a machine with students as cogs. They create rigid structures with rigid rules and then try to maintain control by “pulling levers” and “steering the ship.”

Extraordinary teachers see their classroom as a collection of individual hopes and dreams, all connected to a higher purpose. They inspire students to dedicate themselves not just to their own success but to the success of their peers and therefore to that of the learning community–the school–at large.

3. Teaching is service, not control.

Average teachers want students to do exactly what they’re told. They’re hyper-aware of anything that smacks of insubordination, and they create environments where individual initiative is squelched by a “wait and see what the teacher says” mentality.

Extraordinary teachers set a general direction and then commit themselves to obtaining the resources that their students need to learn. They push power downward, allowing students to make their own decisions as often as possible and intervening only in emergencies.

4. My students are fellow learners; they are not my children.

Average teachers see students as inferior, immature beings who simply can’t be trusted if not overseen by a top-down classroom management system. Students take their cues from this attitude, expend energy on appearing to follow the rules while they cover their behinds when they’re not.

Extraordinary teachers treat every student as if he or she were the most important person in the room. Excellence is fostered every day, from the first day of class to the final exam. As a result, students at all skill levels take charge of their own destinies.

5. Motivation comes from vision, not from fear.

Average teachers see fear–of failure, of ridicule, of loss of privilege–as a crucial way to motivate people.  As a result, students and teachers alike become paralyzed and unable to make risky decisions.

Extraordinary teachers inspire students to see a better future and to see how they’ll be a part of it.  As a result, students work harder because they believe in their classroom’s goals, truly enjoy what they’re doing, and (of course) know they’ll share in the rewards of success.

6. Change equals growth, not pain.

Average teachers see change as both complicated and threatening, something to be endured only when a school is in desperate shape. They subconsciously torpedo change until it’s too late.

Extraordinary teachers see change as an inevitable part of life. While they don’t value change for its own sake, they know that success is only possible if teachers, students, and schools embrace new ideas and new ways of teaching and learning.

7. Technology offers empowerment, not automation.

Average teachers adhere to an outdated view that technology should be used to strengthen classroom control and ensure the predictable delivery of instruction and assessment. They limit access to and use of technology in a way that dehumanizes and antagonizes students.

Extraordinary teachers see technology as a way to free human beings to be creative and to build productive relationships. They adapt their teaching to the technological tools that people actually want to use.

8. Learning should be fun, not mere toil.

Average teachers buy into the notion that learning is, solely, hard work. They fully expect students to resent having to work hard, and therefore average teachers tend to define themselves subconsciously as oppressors and to define their students as victims. Everyone then behaves accordingly.

Extraordinary teachers see learning as something that should be inherently enjoyable–and believe therefore that the most important job of a teacher is, as far as possible, to provide their students with learning situations that can and will make them truly happy.

Read Geoffrey James’s original article here: http://www.inc.com/geoffrey-james/8-core-beliefs-of-extraordinary-bosses.html

Blog Buffets Lead to Tasty Conversations

 

For years, I’ve wondered aloud with colleagues about why some students just won’t blog for class assignments. Granted, many of my students would blog when it was assigned,but often, the students for whom I had labored to create interesting blog assignments–the less-engaged students who usually appreciated less-traditional assignments–we’re no-shows when I checked for blog participation.

Argh! Isn’t Facebook just a giant blog? my colleagues and I moaned. They’re on that all day, from what we hear them talking about between classes. Why won’t they alt-tab over and jot down a few thoughts on our blogs?!

Hold up… Talking about Facebook? Of course they’re talking about Facebook. Did you read what she posted? That was SO crazy. Oh, dude, hold on, I am so gonna comment on that. Wait, me too! Look at all those likes! I wish there was a “don’t like” button… And on and on they go–talking about what’s on Facebook.

Aha! So they like to talk! Not exactly an earth shattering discovery. But more specifically, if there’s something interesting going on in my students’ social media space, their conversation about it extends beyond the boundaries of that space. The conversation continues fluidly, in the online space and in actual space too, sometimes at the same time. This I have observed more times than I can count.

So maybe that’s what my blogs needed: space for real time talk too.

And whole-class conversations about blog questions or responses apparently don’t count. I can understand why that might be the case: whole-class conversations are rarely opportunities to engage in conversation for any but the most talkative students anyway.

So I tried something that felt a little more like the conversations that happen in the clumps of students who gather in the halls between classes or around the desks of students with something interesting to talk about.

  • I rearranged my room, arranging individual desks to form “tables” for three or four or five, and allowed students to sit where they pleased–which meant with friends, mostly.
  • I created a set of blog questions (7 for my first couple “Blog Buffets”) and posted all of them at once on the class blog. I provided each table with one of these thought provoking questions and a QR Code that linked directly to that question on the class blog (saving students about 10 clicks, since most of them navigate to this blog by starting at their own login page).
  • I asked students to chat a bit about the question and, when they felt like they had something interesting to say about it, to scan the code and post their thoughts to the blog.
  • And I kept them moving. Every 10 minutes, they had to get up and move to a different table–and jump into a different conversation.
  • Finally, students left after the Buffet with a ”menu” of the questions and QR Codes so that they could continue their conversations outside of class.

My first Blog Buffet was a delicious success. Students enjoyed the opportunity to talk and blog rather than just blogging on their own. Participation more than doubled: more students were blogging, and blogging students were conversing online more often. And most importantly, their conversations in the classroom and online were idea-rich, content-connected interactions.

I learned a lot from this experience, but most importantly I learned that asking good questions isn’t enough. I have to be smart about providing student-friendly times and places for students not just to answer those questions but to talk about the questions themselves. And all of this resulted from listening to students talk about Facebook. Thanks, Mark Zuckerberg!

DADES QRC Blog Buffet #2

Word Play! (Mobile 2012 Session Documents)

When the high school where I teach launched its mobile learning pilot in the fall of 2011, teachers on the team were commonly asked, “What are you really going to do with those iPods? Won’t the kids just play with them?” While initially getting defensive, I began to embrace the idea of play as central to learning, and I began to use mobile devices and mobilized learning as a way to help my students play, discover, and create.

Wordplay is common throughout the history of literature and language. The Anglo-Saxons insulted each other for fun in Beowulf, and Shakespeare was no slouch when it came to playing with words and phrases in riotously entertaining ways. Why shouldn’t teenagers get to have the same kind of fun in their English/Language Arts classroom?

Linked here (BELOW) is the presentation I delivered at Mobile 2012, a “mobile learning experience” that took place in Phoenix, AZ, on April 11-13, 2012. During this session, I discussed a variety of mobile device-enhanced examples of standards-based, productive uses of wordplay in a high-school English classroom. My students are using mobile devices to comprehend concepts and content, to envision what they read, to crystalize their own thinking, and to have fun sharing their work authentically with each other. (Also linked in this post–BELOW–are the QR Code handouts shared during my session.)

iOS apps featured during the presentation included Songify, ComicBook!, WordFoto, Poetry (from The Poetry Foundation), and the i-nigma QR Code Reader.

Additionally, I recommended a list of ELA “must-have” apps: Shakespeare (the free version is fine), iBooks, Street Tag, Videolicious, Splice, Dropbox, Amazon (for its “Snap It” cover searching), Flickr, and Rory’s Story Cubes.

Learning Sideways?

As I contemplated creating a blog at which to post my thoughts about teaching and learning, I struggled mightily with what to call such a blog. (I am an English teacher, after all; titles matter.)

Recently–I don’t remember exactly how–I came across the work of Harvard professor, psychologist, and author Ellen Langer. In her book, The Power of Mindful Learning, Langer describes a concept she calls “sideways learning”:

The standard two approaches to teaching new skills are top-down or bottom-up. The top-down method relies on discursive lecturing to instruct students. The bottom-up path relies on direct experience, repeated practice of the new activity in a systematic way. Although both approaches have their advocates, I sought a third alternative. […] This approach could be called sideways learning. […] Sideways learning aims at maintaining a mindful state. As we saw, the concept of mindfulness revolves around certain psychological states that are really different versions of the same thing: (1) openness to novelty; (2) alertness to distinction; (3) sensitivity to different contexts; (4) implicit, if not explicit, awareness of multiple perspectives; and (5) orientation in the present. (22-23)

In Langer’s work I found an apt description not just of the kind of teaching and learning I have worked to foster in my classroom but of the way I have tried to approach life itself.

And I found a nifty name for my blog as well.

Welcome to Learning Sideways!